No, I’m not talking Mike Filsaime
I’m talking about Michael Morris! Congrats mate…
Now, let’s take a look at his answers, and dissect them…
1. What Is The Main Thing You Look For In PLR Articles? : For me it is important
that all PLR articles are originally written and unique, meaning they haven’t just
been rewritten/reworded from other sources or simply copied.
PLR articles should have an optimal length (300-700 words) and be optimized in
regard to SEO and Adsense but not “stuffed” with keywords. They should look
natural and appealing to the valued reader.
The reason I chose 300-700 words is because it shouldn’t be too long as readers
might become bored or skip paragraphs. A short to medium length article serves as an
“appetizer” to visit the author’s website for more information.
Our Comments - Long answer! Probably the longest yet… first point about original articles, absolutely, they are 100% original. Second, the 300-700 words in length, our articles are 400-600 words in length and are based around a 1-3% keyword density ratio (for SEO purposes).
2. Pick which version you would prefer in a PLR membership site : - 120 Articles
Limit 25 people @ $97 per month
Our Comments - Sorry Mike, but majority rules! 440 for 200 @ $67 per month it is.
3. What were the reasons for your selection in question 2 : I chose #3 as I
don’t know how many niches you will cover in total. If you cover 20 niches this
would result in 6 articles each which I think is a good level to constantly have
something you can distribute throughout the month to article directories, update
your websites etc.
I also chose #3 as I prefer quality over quantity! Having hundreds of people means
having more problems with duplicate content. Moreover, I’d like to have 120 high
quality articles rather than 440 medium quality. I think the higher amount of
articles also reduces the quality. This of course again depends on how many niches
and how many writers you have.
The gist is higher quality and limited membership.
Our Comments - Quality is a HUGE thing in this game, and because we’ve got our system down pat, the higher the quantity, the same quality we are able to produce. It all comes down to systems.
4. Would you like to be able to have access to multiple memberships at a discount
price? : Yes
Our Comments - Hurrah!
5. If you are currently a member of a PLR site what is the biggest thing they do
wrong (put N/A if you are not a member of another PLR site)? : N/A
Our Comments - Surprisingly, one of the few that is not already a member of a PLR site.
6. If you are currently a member of a PLR site what is the best thing they do right
(put N/A if you are not a member of another PLR site)? : N/A
Our Comments - Nada… zip… zilch…
7. Would you rather have all your articles at the beginning of the month or spread
out consistently? : Consistently Through The Month
Our Comments - Good, that’s how it’s going to be!
8. Quality is obviously of the highest importance when looking at PLR articles, but
what to you determines an articles quality? : Oops, I guess I have answered this
already in question #1.
Our Comments - Indeed you did ![]()
9. Would you consider getting a PLR membership if it was close to, or exactly what
you have outlined above? : Yes
Our Comments - Wonderful… but enjoy your free one ![]()
10. What would be the one thing you would want, or ask for in a PLR membership site
(if it was an ideal world and you could ask for any one thing in a PLR site)? :
I’d like to be offered the opportunity to suggest niches. Members should to some
degree be involved in decisions and suggestions. This way you can improve your
membership site constantly and it’s a WIN-WIN situation for both parties
Our Comments - This was one of the major reasons why we had to postpone the launch, we wanted to make sure that we have an effective system in place that will allow you to have an active involvement with picking the niches. Obviously VERY important.
And that is all she wrote.
Once again, congrats Michael, and we’ll see you on the inside!
Wealth and Abundance,
Daniel Turner
Popularity: 6% [?]





















No comments yet.